THE OWNER OF http://www.crisiszimbabwe.org/, CRISIS IN ZIMBABWE COALITION PROMOTED THE DISRUPTION OF THE WORLD CUP 2010 IN SOUTH AFRICA AND IS PART OF CONTINUED LOCAL INVESTIGATION.
WHEN ZIMBABWE PASSED EMERGENCY REGULATIONS FORBIDDING DEMONSTRATIONS CRISIS COALITION CONTINUED PROMOTING THAT THE UNIONS AND DEMONSTRATORS SHOULD IGNOR SAME.
THIS WAS A DIRECT TERRORIST ATTACK NOT ONLY ON SOUTH SAFRICA BUT ON ALL PARTICIPATING COUNTRIES AS WELL.
TWO PAKESTANI TERRORISTS WERE ARRESTED IN ZIMBABWE ON THE WAY TO THE WORLD CUP, ONE WITH AN INTERNATIONAL WARRANT OF ARREST. “It is understood that the two flew from Saudi Arabia to Tanzania where they fraudulently acquired Kenyan passports before connecting to Zimbabwe by road.
SOUTH AFRICA and ZIMBABWE DESERVES CREDIT FOR CONTAINING AND TWARTING THIS ATTACK.
THE EXECUTIVE OF CRISIS IN ZIMBABWE COALITION IS ZIMRIGHTS FUNDED BY AMONGST OTHERS BY LOCAL EMBASSIES – WHILST ASSERTING TO BE A HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANISATION IT ATTRACTS FUNDS FOR POLITICAL SUPPORT ONLY WHICH IS THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE UK EMBASSY. IT IS THEREFORE CONSIDERED A POLITICAL ORGANISATION BY FIRST WORLD COUNTRIES ENGAGED IN REGIME CHANGE PROPAGANDA.
It will be appreciated that regime change is a terrorist act by itself and this illustrates the dangers of supporting same and how those involved in supplying funds may become tainted or negligent.
Eg. In a meeting to request that funds are with held from this organisation and that a colonel ex SAS be interview in UK where his recruitment as a mercenary was being sought, the reply was simple – we did fund these organisations but it is not terrorism because it failed and didn’t promote violence – they didn’t say disrupt or ignor the law violently. Other embassy officials are at a loss as to what was supposed to be the objective, the statements made in the promotion were saying, like most terrorist action, the motive was simply to get noticed. It is easy to understand the frustration locally; thankfully the person concerned at the embassy has been recalled in June, if he can escape arrest when implicated. One must try to understand the mentality of an embassy official doing something like this and allowing his workmates at the embassy to travel to view the world cup without warning or comment. I cant see any member of the countries electorate approving of this kind of expenditure of public funds.
I do not wish to go into further detail as I have no wish to hamper current investigations save to state that it is noted that a matter of weeks ago the registrar, registrant and administrator have been changed to the USA. whist still being owned by the same Zimbabwe organisation. Presumably the previous registrar picked up complaints on the web and doesn’t want to know.
The previous registrant and administrator had addresses in Zimbabwe.
Any law enforcement agency requiring further details should email firstname.lastname@example.org where their email will be passed on to the relevant local authorities.